Monday, January 24, 2011

FIT: For Sale above P13B?

THE LAST time the government bid out the 100-hectare plus Food Terminal Inc. at a floor price of P13 billion, no developer took a bite. But now that property values have gone up and with the property gaining new interest, the government wants to get more out of this prospective privatization.

Finance Undersecretary John Sevilla said the government would privatize the FTI property like it was selling a merchandise in Rustan’s and not the 168 Mall in Divisoria.

What about the old price of P13 billion? It’s “presyong pang-Greenhills (Greenhills price).” Ergo, no fire-sale expected.—Doris C. Dumlao, Inquirer - Jan 24 2011

For details on RA 9646 or RESA Law, please visit www.ra9646.com. RA9646.com is the central depository of all updates on the new law for the practice of real estate service in the Philippines. The Law has been passed and signed last June 29, 2009. Its implementing rules and regulations (IRR) has been published in July 2010 making the law fully operational as of August 08 2010.

BOI: ITH for P2.5M/unit Low Cost Housing

BoI readies P2.5 M per unit compromise

For low-cost mass housing incentives

MANILA, Philippines – Following strong opposition from mass housing developers, the Board of Investments is willing to compromise for a P2.5 million price per unit ceiling for low-cost mass housing projects to be granted income tax holiday incentives.

This is an improvement from the BoI’s earlier proposal to reduce the cap to P2 million from the current ceiling of P3 million.

An official source said this BoI compromise is shaping up as three associations of mass housing developers have submitted their position papers asking to maintain current cap at P3 million per unit.

Trade and Industry Secretary Gregory L. Domingo has assured the housing sector that he will study their position, but the source said that the secretary is mostly to go for a compromise of P2.5 million.

The official said that P2.5 million price per unit is the most reasonable ceiling because the exemption from value added tax payments is pegged up to P2.5 million also.

“If we really want to help the buyers, this is the reasonable level,” the source added.

Also the BoI plan to limit the grant of ITH to low cost mass housing projects located in key cities may not be included in the 2011 Investment Priorities Plan following the strong clamor from the sector for the retention of incentives.

Under the 2010 IPP, the BoI grants three year ITH to low cost mass housing developers with projects located in the National Capital Region and four years for those outside the NCR. Housing is still listed in the planned 2011 IPP.

In opposing the BoI plan to lower the ceiling price per unit, low cost mass housing developers led by the Subdivision, Housing Developers Association Inc. (SHDA) and the Chamber of Real Estate and Builders’ Associations Inc. (CREBA) said the move is counter productive.

Bansan Choa, chairman of SHEDA, even cited Republic Act 7279, which has set the low cost mass housing price per unit at P2.5 million.

CREBA chairman and CEO Charlie A.V. Gorayeb said the BoI move is a disincentive and goes against the government’s very own battlecry for job creation.

“By reducing the ceiling, we are also reducing the workers and the number of Filipinos who would like to buy houses. There is a big market for P3 million per unit segment,” Gorayeb said.

BoI managing head Cristino L. Panlilio, however, countered that, “If there is a big market then all the more that you don’t need the incentives.”

“If you really want to serve the low and middle income in Metro Manila then the P1 million to P2 million price range per unit is the right figure and this is the range that is even available for financing. That figure is the workable and livable concession with other agencies,” Panlilio said.

In the past two years, the BoI had been flooded with applications for low cost mass housing projects. This sector would account for the most number of projects approved by the BoI with incentives.

2 Solar Farm Facilities in Negros and Bohol

MANILA, Philippines - Youil Ensys, one of South Korea’s largest renewable and engineering power firms, is looking at investing some $160 million into the country’s solar power industry.

Scott Kim, Youil chief executive officer, told reporters over the weekend that its local office, Youil Renewable Energy Corp., will be putting up two solar farm facilities in Negros and Bohol.

He said they plan to construct a 30- megawatt solar power facility in a 70-hectare land in Negros with a project cost of about $120 million.

Another 10 MW is also being eyed by the company in Bohol with an estimated cost of $40 million.

Kim said they expect to put up these plants within six months after securing all necessary approvals.

But he said they would still be waiting for the approval of a feed-in tariff (FIT) before pushing through with these projects.

FIT offers guaranteed payments to renewable energy developers over a period of time.

This is the first time that Youil, a publicy-listed company in Korea, will invest in the Philippines.

Youil Ensys primarily operates in the environmental engineering industry. The company builds and operates solar energy plants. It was founded in 1980 and has headquarter in Hwasung, South Korea.

Kim said they are optimistic that the Philippine government will be able to resolve the FIT issues.

He said the Philippines would be the fourth country in Asia to adopt the FIT next to Korea, Malaysia and Thailand. FIT is also being carried out in Spain, Germany and Canada.

For details on RA 9646 or RESA Law, please visit www.ra9646.com. RA9646.com is the central depository of all updates on the new law for the practice of real estate service in the Philippines. The Law has been passed and signed last June 29, 2009. Its implementing rules and regulations (IRR) has been published in July 2010 making the law fully operational as of August 08 2010.

source: Inquirer, Jan 24 2011



PPP: Public - Private Partnerships

End project guarantees, gov’t urged - SMC

MANILA, Philippines—San Miguel Corp. (SMC) is urging President Benigno Aquino III to drop all state guarantees for projects under the public-private partnership (PPP) program, including railroads, toll ways, seaports and airports.

“The Philippine government should not make any guarantee in any form. It should only make sure that the bidding process is fair and square,” SMC president Ramon S. Ang said in a recent interview with the Philippine Daily Inquirer at the SMC headquarters in Ortigas Center in Pasig City.

Ang urged Mr. Aquino to ensure that the winning bidder provide the best service at the least cost to the public for the entire 25-year term of the build-operate-and-transfer contract.

The President should bid out all the PPP projects in the first quarter and compel all winning bidders to finish the projects within the next three to five years or face forfeiture of their contracts, he said.

During the launch of the PPP projects last year, Mr. Aquino said the government would protect investors from regulatory risk and not market risk.

“If private investors are impeded from collecting contractually agreed fees—by regulators, courts or the legislature—then our government will use its own resources to ensure that they are kept whole,” he said in a speech at the opening of the public-private partnership conference in Pasay City on Nov. 18, 2010.

The President said the government would compensate the private concessionaire for the difference between what the tariff should have been under the formula, and the tariff which it was actually able to collect.

South Luzon Expressway

Mr. Aquino was referring to the Malaysian-backed South Luzon Tollways Corp. (SLTC), which was earlier stopped by the Supreme Court from implementing higher toll rates on the South Luzon Expressway.

SLTC recently raised its rates, aimed at helping it recover the minimum of P12 billion it spent to rehabilitate and modernize the road from Alabang, Muntinlupa, to Sto. Tomas, Batangas.

Ang said the government should stop offering state guarantees just to make infrastructure projects attractive to local and foreign investors because these were viable and Mr. Aquino’s high trust rating has made doing business in the country attractive anew.

Although Ang cited 30 PPP projects, the current administration has revealed an initial list of 10 items—Metro Rail Transit (MRT)-Light Rail Transit expansion (P70 billion); MRT Line 2 extension (P11.29 billion); Bohol airport (P7.54 billion); Puerto Princesa Airport (P4.36 billion); North Luzon Expressway-South Luzon Expressway link (P21 billion); Cavite-Laguna Expressway-Manila side section (P10.5 billion); and Daraga International Airport (P3.07 billion).

Burden on taxpayers

The SMC president said previous state guarantees that covered proponents from legal and financial risks had mostly turned out to be a burden on the public as the government usually ended up shouldering the bulk of the costs and passing these on to consumers in the form of higher fares and toll or higher taxes.

“If this is the case, the government can implement the project itself rather than let a private company make a killing at the expense of the public,” Ang said.

Huge losses from subsidized fares on the Light Rail Transit and Metro Rail Transit lines in Metro Manila have prompted MalacaƱang to give the go-signal to increase fares.

In certain big build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects in the past, the government guaranteed the foreign debt of private firms and losses from currency devaluation.

Ang said all proponents should keep their profit goals modest and their period of recovering their capital much longer to ensure that the railway systems, toll ways, seaports and airports would be affordable to a broad range of consumers.

Reasonable return

Ang said a reasonable return on investment would be about 10 percent per year.

He favored stretching the period for recovering capital to the entire 25-year term of the project, with an option to amortize part of the loan in an extension.

Ang said a proponent could put in as low as 20 percent of the project cost as capital and borrow the rest at very low interest rates and at long-term repayment schemes while still getting a reasonable return without unduly burdening the public.

He cited as an example the North Luzon Expressway which had a toll of P10.25 from Manila to Angeles City when it was still under Philippine National Construction Corp. After it was “asphalted” by an Australian firm, the new operator charged P130 for the same stretch of road, he said.

“If I bid for it and charged 20 percent more, that would be abusive. If I increase it by 10 times, that is out of place,” Ang said.

The SMC head said a bidder’s intention would make all the difference for the public paying either P50 or P500 for the use of a toll road from Manila to Bicol.

Low toll, fare

“Of course, the public would suffer if the winning bidder wants to get his capital at the shortest time possible and maximize his earnings for almost the entire duration of the project. The government should insist on striking a balance between profit and public service. I believe that the public should benefit right away from these projects through low toll fees and fare rates,” Ang said.

According to him, proponents know that the PPP projects would increase the value of their real estate holdings. They should “spread the wealth” by sharing the gains from their properties by reducing the amount they charge their users, he said.

“They have to compute the appreciation in their real estate valuation because this is part of their profits. This way they don’t have to charge spectacular rates in their businesses,” he said.

Ang also said the proponents should not give excuses for demanding that the state guarantee their profits in undertaking PPP projects because low-cost and long-term financing was available.

All bidders are assumed to be good businessmen who are well aware of the risks involved in putting their money in PPP projects, he said.

Too often, Ang said, the government focused mostly on the time it would take over the project (after 25 years) rather than on ensuring that the winning bidder would deliver its service at affordable rates.

He said the new administration should also watch out for bad habits in bidding out BOT projects, such as allowing mere brokers or dummies to make a bid, settling for negotiated offers rather than pushing for competitive bidding, and allowing the BOT proponents to extend their contracts in the middle of their existing deals and without a new bidding.

To maximize the economic impact of the PPP projects, Ang said the President should award these as soon as possible (within the next three months) to ensure that these would be completed under his term.

Deter dummies, brokers

Ang said Mr. Aquino could deter dummies or mere brokers from taking over projects and waiting for financiers by rescinding their deals if they did not finish their projects within three to five years.

“Just imagine the multiplier effect of implementing all these projects at the same time. We will have millions of jobs created and the economy will be alive with activity for years from the suppliers to the subcontractors,” Ang said.

With a projected revenue of P518 billion (roughly $11.8 billion) and cash flow of P81 billion ($1.84 billion) this year, SMC will make a bid for all of the 30 PPP projects planned by the Aquino administration, Ang said.

“When we do business with the government, it should not only be for ourselves but for the good of the country. We will make sure that our bid will be very low,” said Ang who has taken pride in being able to effect more competition in government bidding with SMC’s entry into areas outside its traditional business of beer and food.

Over the past six years, SMC has rebuilt itself from a food and beverage giant into a diversified holding firm with interests in airports, trains, mining, oil and power.

For details on RA 9646 or RESA Law, please visit www.ra9646.com. RA9646.com is the central depository of all updates on the new law for the practice of real estate service in the Philippines. The Law has been passed and signed last June 29, 2009. Its implementing rules and regulations (IRR) has been published in July 2010 making the law fully operational as of August 08 2010.

source: Inquirer, Jan 24 2011


Sunday, January 16, 2011

Bagong Nayong Pilipino: Belle's Casino

Belle to open $350-M casino in Q4

LISTED BELLE Corp., the high-end leisure developer controlled by the family of mall and banking tycoon Henry Sy, has advanced the opening of a $350-million casino complex at the Manila Bay reclamation area to the fourth quarter.

Company executives bared this after formally appointing AB Leisure Global, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Leisure and Resorts World Corp., to act as operator and manager of the casino. The management deal will be in effect for 10 years and may be extended, Belle Vice-Chairman Willy N. Ocier told reporters in a briefing on Friday.

"As operator and manager of the casino, AB Leisure shall exercise supervision, direction and responsibility for the operation of the casino operations in behalf of PremiumLeisure and Amusement pursuant to the provisional license issued by Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor)," the firm said in a disclosure.

Mr. Ocier said that after paying Pagcor a 25% tax on gross revenues from local gamers and 15% on the VIP junket market or foreign market, Belle will secure 15% of net winnings or 50% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, whichever is higher.

Commercial operations of the casino portion of the planned Belle Grande Manila Bay will start in the fourth quarter with 100 "special VIP" suites, Mr. Ocier added. Belle earlier said the casino complex would be opened next year. But executives said on Friday the firm had decided to open the casino earlier to take advantage of holiday spending.

PremiumLeisure and Amusement holds a franchise from state-run Pagcor, which allows PremiumLeisure and Amusement to build and operate a casino at the Manila Bay reclamation area, specifically at the 800-hectare Bagong Nayong Pilipino Manila Bay Entertainment City project. The casino will be part of a $1-billion integrated entertainment project to be built by the Sy-led SM group at the Bagong Nayong Pilipino.

"The target for our complex is we will have at least 800 hotel rooms. Hopefully we can ramp up to 1,500 hotel rooms," Mr. Ocier said. There will be 15,000 to 20,000 square meters of gaming floors with 1,600 slot machines and 300 to 325 tables, Mr. Ocier added. The new figures are higher than the initial plan of 500 rooms, 1,500 slot machines, and 250 tables.

Leisure and Resorts World will be investing money on interiors, gaming equipment, working capital and furniture, Manuel A. Gana, executive vice-president and chief financial officer of Belle, told reporters.

Mr. Ocier said the Belle casino will aim to grab a slice of the Asian market. "We are not even aiming at the local market that is being serviced well by Pagcor," Mr. Ocier said, adding the company will provide "five-star" amenities to attract players frequenting Macau and Singapore.

An official who asked not to be named said Belle expects P1.5 billion in net income from the casino business in the first full year of operations. In 2009, consolidated profits of Belle jumped by 87% to P385.8 million, the bulk of which came from the real estate business.

Asia Pacific Gaming of Macau was named consultant of the casino project.

On its Web site, Asia Pacific Gaming claims to be a "leader" in gaming consultancy and management services, with clients in South Korea, China, Macau, the Philippines, Australia, the United States, New Zealand, Vanuatu, Tahiti, and the Solomon Islands.

Mr. Gana said the company was also in talks with investment banks abroad to bankroll the project. Last November, Belle signed a P5.6-billion loan facility with Banco De Oro Unibank, Inc.


Belle and Leisure and Resorts World wanted to tap entertainment giant Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. for the casino project, but negotiations bogged down in October. Under a five-year development plan, Belle and Leisure and Resorts World will spend $350 million to build the casino complex.

Shares in Leisure and Resorts World went down by P0.33 to P6.85 each on Friday. Shares in Belle fell by P0.19 to P5.60 apiece. -- Neil Jerome C. Morales

Belle, LR keen on Pagcor assets


By Doris Dumlao
Philippine Daily Inquirer

Posted date: January 16, 2011


MANILA, Philippines—Leisure estate and gaming firm Belle Corp., in partnership with Leisure and Resorts World Corp. (LR), is keen on bidding for the assets of state-owned Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor) once the Aquino administration decides to auction off the firm’s casino operations.

Belle, which is 64-percent controlled by tycoon Henry Sy’s SM group but independently managed by a group led by businessman Willy Ocier, signed on Friday with LR an operating deal on a P20-billion casino to be called “Belle Grande Manila Bay” that will rise in the coastal reclamation area by the end of this year.

On the much-anticipated Pagcor privatization, Ocier said: “We don’t know when that will be, but if and when they do, Belle and LR will obviously be interested in bidding for the casinos outside of Metro Manila and we are eagerly awaiting Pagcor’s terms of reference.”

In a press briefing during the signing of the operating agreement with LR, Ocier said Belle was “very comfortable” working with LR, a company founded by businessman-turned-Congressman Albee Benitez, who is now representing the third district of Negros Occidental.

LR got its big break 17 years ago when the SM group allowed the company to set up professional bingo parlors in its SM malls. Through subsidiary First Cagayan Leisure and Resort Corp., LR is also the master licensor, regulator and supervisor of the Cagayan Special Economic Zone and Free Port (Ceza), which now has three casinos.

The development of the gaming business in Ceza, Ocier said, was achieved with the help of consultancy group Asian Pacific Gaming, which has expertise in running a number of profitable casinos in Macau.
Asian Pacific Gaming was also tapped by LR to work on the upcoming casino in Manila Bay.

Ocier added that the Belle-LR tandem was expecting to face stiff competition in joining the prospective auction for Pagcor assets given the likely interest that such privatization would draw from other parties.

Diversifying conglomerate San Miguel Corp. was the first to be reported to be interested in Pagcor, but other groups with gaming operations may likewise join the fray. Real-estate tycoon Andrew Tan, for instance, leads the robust Resort World development across the Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 3 in Pasay City. Ocier said Resort World was “rocking” but Belle would like to give it some serious competition.

Reveille : The crown jewel of our Armed Forces


By Ramon J. Farolan
Philippine Daily Inquirer

Posted date: January 17, 2011


FIRST OF all, let me congratulate Col. Abraham Bagasin who last Saturday took over command of the First Scout Ranger Regiment in San Miguel, Bulacan. Bagasin, PMA Class 1983, is a younger brother of Defense Undersecretary Samuel Bagasin, Class 1973. Another Bagasin, Joel, Class 1984, resigned from the Air Force early in his career to join commercial aviation and is now with Eva Air, a Taiwanese airline. The Bagasins hail from Cagayan although Ilocos Norte was the original family home province.

You may recall that in September 2005, Sam Bagasin was a principal figure in one of the most embarrassing snafus in AFP command arrangements. Maj. Gen. Samuel Bagasin, commanding general of the Fourth Infantry Division, was supposed to take over the all-important Southcom position in Mindanao. His parents had flown in from San Diego to attend his promotion. At the last minute President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo cancelled his assumption and instead designated Lt. Gen. Edilberto Adan, AFP deputy chief of staff, as officer in charge of Southcom. No explanation for the abrupt change in plans was ever made by the commander in chief.

* * *

Once again there is talk of selling military camps for the purpose of, among other things, modernizing our Armed Forces. The last time this was done, the government sold off Fort Bonifacio also in the name of AFP modernization goals. Today more than 10 years after, not a single peso can be identified from that sale as having benefited the Armed Forces.

How ironic that we spend so much time and effort trying to recover some P300 million in plundered money from former AFP comptroller Maj. Gen. Carlos Garcia, and yet we do not see any need to account for some P6 billion in funds which rightfully should have been used for the men and women in uniform.

This is not to condone the actions of General Garcia. He has brought disgrace to the military institution and should be punished, and all ill-gotten wealth taken back. Perhaps just as important as recovering ill-gotten wealth is the need to determine who were his partners in crime. General Garcia certainly could not have amassed so much money all by his lonesome self. Someone, some people must have given him the green light or go signal, in exchange for a share of the loot.

Now we are talking about selling off the crown jewel of our Armed Forces, the home of the AFP—Camp Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo.

Perhaps even more than Fort Bonifacio, Camp Aguinaldo represents hallowed ground. For more than half a century, it is here where military formations have marched in review each year to salute the commander in chief and to pay their respects to the office he represents. The ceremony on AFP grounds has come to symbolize acceptance by the military organization of civilian supremacy over the Armed Forces. This significance is sometimes lost or is taken for granted in the pomp and pageantry that accompanies the event. Some 35 AFP chiefs of staff have used these grounds to pledge support for the Constitution and the protection of our people. It is also at Camp Aguinaldo that we witness the never-ending change of command rituals that mark the assumption of new leadership in the Armed Forces.

There are conflicting reports on the origins of Camp Aguinaldo. But let me try to provide you with a brief history of the Camp for a better appreciation of its historical value.

The negotiations for the acquisition of the present site started as early as 1932. Gen. Basilio Valdes was tasked to look around for an area suitable for development as a future Constabulary Headquarters. Valdes came across a possible site on the present Santolan Road in Quezon City and realized that the property belonged to a family friend, Francisco Ortigas. Ortigas offered the land for the price of P0.50 centavos per square meter, or about P125,000 for the whole area.

With the lack of funds, the purchase was set aside for a while. The following year Ortigas lowered his price but there were still not enough funds available. Negotiations between Ortigas and the government continued until the former graciously offered the land for free on condition that the authorities immediately put up barracks for a detachment of Constabulary officers and men. It may not have been a purely altruistic spirit that led to the donation. I suspect that having a security detachment in such a remote area (at that time) would eventually lead to the opening up of valuable land with possibilities that only a far-sighted real estate developer could appreciate.

In March 1934, 25 hectares were donated to the government with the stated purpose: “For Philippine Constabulary barracks and officers’ quarters, or for any other armed institution which may in the future perform the functions of the Philippine Constabulary.” This was followed much later in 1974 by another donation of a smaller area of 1.2 hectares along EDSA (Epifanio delos Santos Avenue). The remainder of Camp Aguinaldo, consisting of 152 hectares, was purchased by the government from Ortigas, Madrigal and Company at prices ranging from P0.13 to P0.50 per square meter.

After the land acquisition, prison labor was used for the clearing of the forested areas, and in 1935 Maj. Mariano CastaƱeda moved a PC service battalion to the camp site, and became the first camp commander. Later the site was named Camp Murphy after Frank Murphy, the last of the American governors general in the country, and the first US high commissioner after the establishment of the Philippine Commonwealth. In 1964, the installation was renamed Camp General Emilio Aguinaldo, in honor of the President of the First Philippine Republic.

Today Camp Aguinaldo is home to the main headquarters of the Armed Forces, the Defense Department, the National Defense College of the Philippines, the Command and General Staff College, the Philippine Veterans Affairs Office, the AFP Museum, the AFP Commissioned Officers Club and various other key offices of the military high command. It also provides quarters for officers and enlisted men, including an 18-hole golf facility for military personnel and civilian guests. Real estate financial experts say the Camp could easily fetch P55 billion if it is put up for sale.

For President Aquino, Secretary Cesar Purisima and Secretary Voltaire Gazmin:

Let us learn from the past and not rush into the disposal of valuable assets without first knowing what exactly we need and what are our priorities so as to be able to maximize the funds to be raised from any sale. And if the money is truly for AFP modernization needs (a better term would be capability upgrade), let us ensure that the funds are not diverted elsewhere for other purposes or even worse, end up in the pockets of unscrupulous individuals who this early, are beginning to smell the sweet scent of money in what may be the first big deal of this century.