NUMBERS DON'T LIE
By ANDREW JAMES MASIGAN
June 11, 2012, 3:10pm
Last month, I wrote about how the IMF saw the Philippines posting one
of the slowest growth rates in the region this year. The
Washington-based bank projected Philippine growth within the vicinity of
4.2 percent, trailing Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam. As if
on cue, the same forecast was parroted by other financial institutions
including the DBS Group of Singapore, Standard Chartered Bank and the
Citi Group.
I personally thought that the prognosis of these financial
institutions did not do us justice—4.2 percent was too low considering
that exports made a dramatic rebound over the first quarter, as did OFW
remittances and tourism receipts. Even government spending was on
overdrive given the effects of the R72 billion stimulus package launched
last year. All things said, I thought that growth of 5.2 to 5.7 percent
was about fair.
DTI Sec. Greg Domingo also thought the IMF sold us short. When I
spoke to him last month, he said that most financial institutions only
take global economic trends into consideration and not the latest
developments in the local landscape. The Secretary was confident that we
would surpass the IMF forecast. His estimate back then was between 4.5
to six percent.
Last week, NEDA finally announced our first quarter stats and pegged
our growth at 6.4 percent. This exceeded everyone’s expectations
including Sec. Domingo’s most optimistic forecast. Even better was that
we are proving the IMF wrong by a long shot. Not only did we outdo the
bank’s forecast by as much as 2.2 percentage points (equivalent to R32
billion worth of goods and services), we also outperformed Vietnam which
grew by just four percent; Thailand, which grew by .3 percent; and the
current darling of the investment world, Indonesia, which grew by 6.3
percent. Redemption, even a tentative one, is sweet indeed.
A New Respect
But even before our first quarter stats were released, I could
already feel a new “curiosity”, and shall I say, respect, for the recent
advances we’ve made as a nation. No doubt, the good news about our
reform program is resonating in many business circles overseas.
Last week, I attended the Global Leadership Conference of the
Entrepreneur’s Organization (EO) in Manama, Bahrain, a gathering of at
least 300 prominent entrepreneurs from 37 nations. The Philippines has
always been an active chapter in the EO circuit being one of the oldest
chapters in the region. I have the honor of being one of the founding
members in the Philippines, having helped launch the organization in
1996.
E.O. has several international conferences every year and the
Philippine chapter never fails to be represented. I myself have attended
more conferences than I can count. For some reason, we Filipinos have
become known as the most approachable and fun chapter, having the unique
ability to connect with fellow Asians, North Americans and Latinos. It
just comes naturally to us, perhaps even to the chagrin of other
chapters.
But despite being “popular”, we’ve never seen a genuine interest from
our fellow entrepreneurs on the goings-on in the Philippines. As far as
I can remember, I have never interacted with people interested in our
economy or how it is to do business here. Not until Manama, Bahrain.
Throughout the conference, I was pulled aside, on several occasions,
by colleagues from Latin America, Europe and the States to share my
views on our economy and the opportunities that may be available for
them. This has never happened before. Apparently, news is reverberating
that the Philippines will be the next investment-grade economy,
following Indonesia. Typically, keen entrepreneurs want to position
themselves before everyone else.
We made a bid for the Philippines to host the next EO Global
Leadership Conference in April 2013 and was in competition with Thailand
and Japan for the privilege. I am proud to announce that we won by a
landslide. It seems those in the know want a piece of the Philippines
now.
Drivers Of Growth
I was glad to see that this time around the country’s growth was
driven from multiple sectors and not just from one source. This tells me
that the economy is growing holistically. Still, I am worried that
foreign direct investments still contribute pittance to our overall
growth equation. Fine, it increased 154 percent in the first two months
of the year, bringing in $850 million in fresh capital, but it is still
not enough to make a significant dent in our growth numbers.
In any event, growth is growth and I am just happy that economic
expansion exceeded population growth two times over. For curious minds
like mine who want to know where our growth stemmed from and how each
area of the economy fared, here is a summary according to subsector.
The services sector, which contributes more than half of total
domestic output, grew by a healthy 8.5 percent. Among its subsectors,
wholesale and retail grew by 8.9 percent, other services grew by 10.5
percent, and real estate grew by 7.9 percent. Supporting growth in this
sector is the 1.15 million tourist arrivals, which provided increased
economic activity in transportation, communication, hospitality (hotels
and restaurants), as well as recreational, cultural and sporting
activities.
The industrial sector, on the other hand, grew by 4.9 percent. Again,
a closer look into its subsectors reveal that manufacturing grew 5.7
percent, primarily due to strong demand here and abroad for
Philippine-made furniture, apparel and food products. Utilities grew by
8.0 percent and construction by (only) 3.6 percent. Apparently, private
construction contracted by -9.9 percent and was only offset by
substantial increases in public construction.
After several quarters of decline, merchandise exports rebounded
and grew by 7.1 percent while service exports (mainly from the BPO
industry) grew by 11.1 percent. Net exports receipts was the second
highest contributor to growth after the services sector.
Agriculture was somewhat a disappointment, growing by only one
percent. As usual, OFW remittance was our main source of liquidity,
growing at 5.4 percent, pumping in $4.8 billion into the system. No
surprise household consumption grew by 6.6 percent.
All factors taken into account, our impressive growth would not
have been possible without the massive increase in government spending.
Thankfully, DBM’s early release of budget allocations last January paved
the way for government agencies to fast-track the implementation of
their respective infra projects. This allowed government spending to
increase by 24 percent.
To the man on the street, all these facts and figures translate to
1.101 million new jobs and increased dispensable income per household.
Can Growth Be Sustained?
Again, some financial institutions think not. Both HSBC and the DBS
Group think that the worsening situation in Europe and our dicey
relations with China could weigh heavy on our export performance for the
rest of the year. As mentioned earlier, net exports are our second
driver of growth so a damper on this could drag down our performance for
the entire year. HSBC’s regional economist, Trinh Nguyen, doubts
whether government can sustain its high spending rate. While some
financial institutions like Japan’s Nomura Securities have increased
their 2012 growth projections for the country to 5.1 percent, HSBC
maintains that we can only manage 4.4 percent growth for the entire
year.
Even if government set a fighting target of between five to six
percent growth, both NEDA Sec. Balisacan and DTI Sec. Domingo think we
will surpass it.
Their optimism is predicated on our performance in April and May,
a period where Europe was in the doldrums of its crisis. NEDA noted
that despite the serious credit crunch in the western hemisphere,
initial data indicate that our exports in fact increased so much so that
they are looking at a 10 percent year on year uptake.
In addition, Sec. Baltican believes there is still considerable room
to accelerate government spending. On top of the continued capital
expenditures of the DPWH and the DOTC, there are now 22 multi-billion
projects ready for bidding at the PPP Center (from just under five
projects this time last year). As to whether they will actually see
public bidding this year or not is another story. The point is, the
Secretary stresses, the projects in the PPP pipeline will be rolled out
eventually and the economy will surely feel its ripple effect.
On the social infrastructure side, Balitacan disclosed that an
additional R9.02 billion will be spent over and above what was already
allocated in the national budget, on projects to benefit public health,
education and social welfare. Balitacan believes that this should be
sufficient to cover any negative effect the Eurozone crisis might bring.
For his part, Sec. Domingo is optimistic that substantive investments
will begin to pour in this year. He has been busy going on road shows
and entertaining investment missions into the country, with very
promising results. He tipped on a new multi-billion dollar investment in
the shipbuilding industry due to be finalized in the next few months.
And so, it all boils down to HSBC’s word against that of our
government technocrats. As we have done with the IMF, I hope we prove
HSBC wrong yet again.
Andrew is an economist, political analyst and businessman. He is a
20-year veteran in the hospitality and tourism industry. For comments
and reactions, e-mail
andrew_rs6@yahoo.com. Follow Andrew on Twitter @aj_masigan.
For latest update on real estate
development and its RA 9646, the Real Estate Service Act of 2009, visit
www.ra9646.com.